a375p cells (Korean Cell Line Bank)
Structured Review

A375p Cells, supplied by Korean Cell Line Bank, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/a375p+cells/pmc12843115-80-2-4?v=Korean+Cell+Line+Bank
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Comparative Bioactivities and Fatty Acid Composition of Pinus koraiensis Leaf Oils Obtained Using Different Extraction Methods"
Article Title: Comparative Bioactivities and Fatty Acid Composition of Pinus koraiensis Leaf Oils Obtained Using Different Extraction Methods
Journal: Life
doi: 10.3390/life16010049
Figure Legend Snippet: Comparison of the cancer cell growth inhibitory effects of Pinus koraiensis essential oil (EPO) and supercritical CO 2 extract oil (SPO) on various human cancer cell lines. ( A , B ) Colon cancer (SW620, HCT116), ( C , D ) lung cancer (A549, H460), ( E , F ) prostate cancer (PC-3, DU145), ( G ) breast cancer (MDA-MB-231), and ( H ) melanoma (A375P) cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of EPO or SPO for 24 h. Cell viability was measured using the MTS assay, and the results are expressed as the mean ± SD ( n = 3). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 versus control groups.
Techniques Used: Comparison, MTS Assay, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Comparison of the effects of Pinus koraiensis essential oil (EPO) and supercritical CO 2 extract oil (SPO) on iNOS mRNA expression and nitric oxide (NO) production. ( A ) THP-1 and ( B ) HaCaT cells were treated with or without LPS for 24 h, and LPS-stimulated cells were co-treated with EPO or SPO. ( C ) SW620 and ( D ) A375P cells were treated with EPO or SPO for 24 h without LPS stimulation. Relative mRNA expression levels of iNOS were analyzed via qRT-PCR. ( E , F ) Nitric oxide levels in LPS-stimulated THP-1 ( E ) and HaCaT ( F ) cells were measured by the Griess assay after co-treatment with EPO or SPO. Data are presented as the mean ± SD ( n = 3). Different letters indicate significant differences ( p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA).
Techniques Used: Comparison, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Griess Assay


